Worked best: generally speaking, the work the Berkman Center has put into providing Internet access to the meetings. Also, the online (email) participation from some members of the board. Consideration of an at-large membership has been a good thing imho, even though it is not fully formed yet.(posted 8904 days ago)Worked least: some board members do not participate in online email discussions; some discussions ultimately degenerate into flames; some issues seem intrinsically volatile and thus it's never possible to approach them academically (e.g. the latest thread about the CORE vs. IODesign .web TLD).