This kind of answers a question I have had in my mind for a while, which is why, in some cases, has a particular lender (no prizes for guessing which) specifically *not* threatened court action to some shortfall victims, merely pressed for a settlement as an 'amicable' solution, and ignored requests for evidence and proof of the claim.(posted 8512 days ago)Is it possibly to steer clear of CPR pre-action disclosure? Which makes me think that the documents being sought - all the stuff suggested by this site (deed, MIG, valuations etc) - *are* important in and of themselves, rather than simply being some bits of paper the lender can't be arsed to retrieve from the warehouse and supply.
It's a thought, certainly.