This link may not work after a day or two, but it it is in the Times Online Dec 17th 2002 in an article called "Estate agent pays the price" By Steve Bird and Claire McDonald(posted 7799 days ago)http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-516376,00.html
The estate agents sold a house (megabucks one) for substantially less than a comparable property in the same area. The vendor who lost out sued - and won! Sounds similar to repossession sales to me and I wonder if the judgement can be applied in reverse?. Judge Peter Heppel QC ruled against the Estate Agents.Mr Knatchbull is the property vendor.
Thoughts anyone?