Can some tell me if this is the correct way to answer Drydens letter after they have been served a Subject Access Rights Notice....(posted 7607 days ago)Cheers
From: Withheld
Ref: Subject Access Rights Request
To: Witheld
Dear Madam
WITHOUT PREDJUDICE
I am in receipt of your letter dated 18th June 2003 and note the contents.
I see that you have indicated that you are the Data Processors and that you will pass on to the Data Controller who will respond in due course.
That’s all very well, but is not the request which the Subject Access Rights was served.
It is to acquire all information that you hold on me in all areas of your business.
As you have written to me in regards to the disputed monies that your client The Bradford and Bingley PLC claims I owe, you must either have documents or requests via your client on me.
I would like to see all copies of all documents relating to me as the Subject Access Document served upon you dated 17th June 2003 requests.
If on the other hand the Data Controller is in fact an employee of Dryden’s then please accept my apologies and I await the documents in question.
Yours sincerely,