Many years ago I used some TMax 100 and didn't like it. It seemed to produce a "weak" negative. I am talking just after it was first introduced (late 1970's or early 1980's?).(posted 8668 days ago)I started using TMax 400 instead, and recently went to Delta 400 and 100.
However, very recently (like last week!) I couldn't get TMax 400 and had to use TMax 100 instead. After I processed it in HC110 I was "floored!" The negative was strong (good density), and the printed image has exceptional resolution and a long tonal scale.
I am going to try to post an html image of one of the shots with the 35mm TMax 100.
I used the TMax 100 in my Canonet GIII for "fun shots" and they are better than my Medium format images on Delta 400.
I recall way back that Kodak was having problems with the TMax 100 emulsion. Am I correct to assume this has been corrected? If so, this is my B/W film from now on. Any thoughts?