I have been developing my own B&W film for about six months now and have been puzzled by a recent result using Ilfosol S @ 1:9. I had exposed a roll of HP5+ at 1600 ISO but had developed it at 400 ISO @20C, (9 min, i think , from memory). The negatives were fine, with nice tonal range and good contrast. XP2 has the ability to have different frames rated at different speeds, because of HP5's latitude can i conclude the same thing? I am currently reading Gene Nocon'c Photographic Printing where he advocates developing at the manufacturers speed regardless of how film was exposed. Does anyone have any comments? Many thanks in advance Andrew(posted 8627 days ago)