I'm curious to hear feedback from others regarding the comparative qualities of Delta 400 (new) and HP5+.(posted 8270 days ago)I formulate my own developer (catechol based) and so my results may not be indicative of what others might experience. In any case, I have not found Delta 400's grain any finer than HP5+. Nor, in fact, do I find it yields greater resolution of fine detail. I think HP5+ is at least its equal in these areas. Ironically, these are the areas one would expect superiority in a film exhibiting modern grain structure.
However, what I have found using Delta 400 is a superb tonal scale. In this respect, it blows away HP5+. Also, Delta 400's edge acutance, which supports an illusion of sharpness, is stunning. Objects often have a 3-dimensional look, suggesting layers of depth one seldoms sees. The first time I noticed this in a Delta 400 print, I thought it was a fluke, but I have seen it repeatedly now. I keep glancing at Delta 400 prints and going back for a closer look.
I've long been an HP5+ fan, but Delta 400 has certainly turned my head. (I just wish it was available in 4x5!) What have the rest of you experienced?