A wet Easter weekend here in Sydney has me pondering, yet again, the musings of Phil Davis.(posted 8118 days ago)Firstly, I suppose, I should ask: How many of you folk use the BTZS techniques? How do you find it in terms of what it delivers?
But my main point of confusion is: I have read through the procedures of paper and film testing, flare and reciporcity evaluation and the incident vs. spotmeter debate but I can find no reference to callibrating your meter of choice with the system. Am I stupid?
For the most part I can see the advantages of the Davis's concept and I like the sound of it, but if you meter is out, how you you know or compensate? Or is this to be done by the old AA and MW systems I've used for years.
happy Easter, hope it's sunny where you are,
Walter Glover