... Double Flowergreenspun.com : LUSENET : Nature Photography Image Critique : One Thread |
-- Tait Stangl (taits@usa.net), October 29, 1998
Good eye! The out of focus blossom in the back frames the front blossom almost perfectly. I wish the background were not so neat; makes it look like a studio shot though I know it is not. But really nice all in all.
-- Mike Green (mgprod@mindspring.com), October 29, 1998.
Nice effect. Please tell us how you accomplished it.
-- Keith Clark (ClarkPhotography@spiritone.com), October 29, 1998.
Nice shot but this is an image which definately would look better square. The left side has a lot of wasted space which does not contribute to your image.
-- al (nissar@idt.net), October 29, 1998.
Awesome shot! My only criticism is in the framing. Perhaps if you went verticle?
-- Andy Matinog (nonoboy@idiom.com), October 29, 1998.
Double flower or double exposure? The background is what? This is one of those great artsy shots. I really like it. Will you please share your secret?Cheers
-- Bill (Bill.Wyman@utas.edu.au), October 29, 1998.
This is my pure photographic talent. JK :) This was created with two flowers one about a foot behind the other, and just the sun. The background was most likely a street. How likly is it that I could make $ of a shot like this? Thanks for the comments guys.
-- Tait Stangl (taits@usa.net), October 30, 1998.
I disagree with the suggestions that a square format or a vertical format would have worked better. I think it is well balanced. Hey, it follows the "rule of thirds" quite nicely.
-- Steve Romney (wallace@xmission.com), November 04, 1998.
I love that shot.You can bet I'll be trying to master the method.Don't tell me though , you never know where I'll end up.By the way.How did you get a last name for a first?
-- John Tait (jtait@northcom.net), December 04, 1998.