Rolling Watergreenspun.com : LUSENET : Nature Photography Image Critique : One Thread |
Have not had a chance to post for quite a while.
Thanks for the comments,
Tait
-- Tait Stangl (taits@usa.net), January 15, 1999
A bit too much negative space in the upper right hand corner. Other than that, it is a gorgeous piece of art. It would nice as a 16x20 Ilfochrome from Portland Photographics with a 4" wide white matte in a dark grey pitted steel frame. Nice work, Tait.
-- Sean Yamamoto (seany@altavista.net), January 15, 1999.
Really lovely shot. I think the upper right corner is fine; there is some detail along the far right edge, works well together with the rolling water. I wish you hadn't told us what it was right off, it's not an obvious image.
-- Andrew Y. Kim (andy_roo@mit.edu), January 15, 1999.
A beautiful abstract. The top rhs does not bother me. It gives me the space to follow the wave through. well done.
-- Bahman Farzad (cpgbooks@mindspring.com), January 15, 1999.
Great texture and detail in the image. I would not have been able to identify the subject without the title. Nice work!
-- Garry Schaefer (schaefer@pangea.ca), January 15, 1999.
Wonderfull light. If the right is a waterfall in shadow where was the light coming from, a spot through trees or something? Thanks for posting it.
-- Micheal F. Kelly (kellys@alaska.net), January 16, 1999.
Like it a lot ! I think without the space from the right of the frame , the wave would be prisoner of the picture. Now I can hear it rolling !
-- Adrian Sorescu (guide@rokura.ro), January 18, 1999.
Again thanks for the comments everyone. As I recall this scene was in a shadow hence the reason it is so dark in the upper right is that there was no reflected light coming off that smooth part of the water.
-- Tait Stangl (taits@usa.net), January 20, 1999.
Tait, I love the "feathery" look of the water and the feeling of motion and turbulence that the water has. A very nice abstract.
-- Barbara Kelly (kellys@alaska.net), January 22, 1999.