Great Falls of the Potomac at Sunrisegreenspun.com : LUSENET : Nature Photography Image Critique : One Thread |
-- Jack Kennealy (jackk@agate.net), February 06, 1999
Very pretty--engaging composition. Just curious, but did you try one photo with a longer shutter speed to blur the water?
-- Edward C. Nemergut (ecnemerg@iupui.edu), February 06, 1999.
The boiling foreground water, the side light on the rocks and the mist rising off the water and partially obscuring the background trees make for a very nice composition. Good work!
-- Garry Schaefer (schaefer@pangea.ca), February 06, 1999.
Jack, your blending of warm/cold and hard/soft elements is excellent.
-- Carlos Co (co@che.udel.edu), February 07, 1999.
Excellent job of combining a great subject in great light!
-- Larry Korhnak (lvk@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu), February 07, 1999.
I can feel the river's power and chill from here! The jutting rocks standing so formidable against the onrushing currentterrific.I am also curious, DID you get a shot with silky, blurred out water? That sure would change the feel of this shot.
-- Jim Harrison (hphoto@earthlink.net), February 08, 1999.
Edward and Jim, spurred by your question I dug and retrieved the sheets from this shoot and, alas, there are no comparable shots with longer shutter speeds. Now that my memory has been jogged, I recall that I had only about 30-60 seconds of the light I wanted and I used all of that with composition/framing variations and none with exposure variations. Sorry...
-- Jack Kennealy (jackk@agate.net), February 08, 1999.
This is the type of shot I love. Lots of things going on with depth, light and composition; makes me want to look again. I usually shoot this sort of things at slower shutter speeds, but I think this works well because the chop in the water mirrors the rugged rocks.
-- Mike Green (mgprod@mindspring.com), February 09, 1999.