[civicprep] Nationwide Utilities Event Action Alert

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

[snip]

To: civicprep
Subject: [civicprep] Nationwide Utilities Event Action Alert
Date: Thursday, April 15, 1999 1:36 PM

Next week there will be a debate and discussion of national importance in Boston regarding Utilities and the Year 2000. Please send a request to C-Span ASAP to request that they give this two hour meeting nationwide coverage.
events@C-span.org


It is VITAL for the public to hear this first of it's kind debate (see panelists below)

If you have a mailing list please send it to them and ask them to zip an email to C-Span so the whole country can hear. (I mean what good will it do only us here in Massachusetts if Gary North can't hear what's said and tell all the next day why we're so silly to be optimistic! ) All you need is one or two sentences, based on the press release below.

Press Release:

"The Y2K Computer Problem and Public Utilities--A Rare Discussion with the Experts"

Wednesday, April 21, 1999
Cove Auditorium
Eastern Nazarene College
23 East Elm Avenue
Quincy, MA
7 - 9 PM

The third in a series of panel discussions on Y2K-related issues between now and the year 2000. Offered by The Center for Millennial Studies at Boston University (www.mille.org) and Eastern Nazarene College.

The experts offer widely varying views of how ready our public utilities will be to handle Y2K. How reliable are their predictions and on what do they base them? Are they even looking at the same data? A panel of front-line industry Y2K technicians and independent Year 2000 analysts will discuss and debate your questions on the readiness of New England and of the Nation for Y2K.

The event is free and open to the public and is wheelchair accessible.

The Center for Millennial Studies at Boston University is a non-profit organization studying and archiving the many issues surrounding the approach and passage of millennial dates, including the years 2000-2001.

For more information, please call Eastern Nazarene College at 617/745-3715 or visit The CMS's web site at www.mille.org

Panelists:

7 Phil Prugnarola, Manager of Information Resources and Y2K remediation coordinator at Seabrook Nuclear Station who will address their state of readiness and potential problems
7 Jim Sinclair, Manager of Governmental Relations and Public Informationand member of the Y2K team at ISO New England-the people who run and manage the power "grid" for the New England region
7 Rick Cowles, national Y2K utilities expert, author and "critic" of the power industry's Y2K readiness
7 Lou Marcoccio, the leading Y2K coordinator for the Gartner Group
7 Steve Bray CEO of Power Plus (Orange County, California) a national Temporary Power expert will address inventory and safety concerns for those using back-up power supplies.

Panelists will be available for individual or group interviews immediately following this event, in the Cove auditorium media room.

[/snip]

~C~

-- Critt Jarvis (middleground@critt.com), April 15, 1999

Answers

Hello, Critt,

Anyone who attends might want to ask questions about articles such as this one:

http://www.canada.com/newscafe/getcp.asp?bk=business&sk=990 414/b041451.html

(for educational purposes only)

Some power plants will miss Y2K deadline

MICHAEL MACDONALD

TORONTO (CP) - At least two electric power plants in Canada will not meet the industry's June 30 deadline for Y2K readiness, the Canadian Electricity Association said Wednesday.

The association, which represents 28 major power utilities, won't say which plants have decided to delay testing and contingency planning for the computer glitch known as the millennium bug.

"We're talking about small thermal generating plants in both cases," said Francis Bradley, vice-president of the trade organization.

A public report, due next month, will outline what remains to be done at the plants, but the location of each plant will be kept secret.

Bradley stressed that staff at the plants have not been dragging their heels. The testing will be delayed until after June because that's when the plants are scheduled to be temporarily shut down for routine maintenance.

"It doesn't make any sense to do it now - in April or May - when for years the schedule had those plants coming off line in the summer," Bradley said.

Besides, missing the June deadline doesn't mean the plants won't be ready by year end, he added.

Bradley was responding to a report from a U.S. Internet news service that alleges the North American Electric Reliability Council, a non- profit watchdog agency, is trying to cover up the industry's Y2K problems.

The report, from WorldNetDaily, cited a memo from the council that tells power companies to withhold information about their Y2K problems from the public and from the U.S. Energy Department.

The document refers to "exceptions," which means the reasons a utility might give for failing to meet the June deadline.

"All identified exceptions will be held in strict confidence and will not be reported to (the Energy Department) or the public," the memo says. "The exceptions will be reviewed by (the council's) Y2K project staff for reasonableness and reliability impact on operations into the Year 2000."

Council spokesman Gene Gorzelnik could not be reached for comment Wednesday, but the report quoted him saying the memo was authentic.

Most of Canada's major power suppliers are members of council, which is based in Princeton, N.J.

Bradley, whose office is in Montreal, confirmed that Canada's 17 major "bulk electricity" utilities were also asked to report "exceptions" to the council.

But he dismissed allegations of a coverup.

"I don't accept that," he said. The electric reliability council "has been on the forefront of highlighting Y2K problems with electricity."

Bradley said the group was expected to draft a list describing what needed to be done to make North America's power companies Y2K ready. But again that list would not identify any individual utilities.

"They will not be releasing what is effectively proprietary company information," he said.

"The greater concern that we have in the industry is that companies are reporting as much as possible. There are concerns that they have with respect to confidentiality."

-- Rachel Gibson (rgibson@hotmail.com), April 15, 1999.


---might be an interesting debate, but the deck looks a wee stacked to me. Reality is, so far, that hard questions don't get answered. I remember the first big atlanta public y2k conference, I asked the state y2k czar here some rather embarrassing (to him) "what if" type questions, and the waffling was practically tactile, in fact other audience members kept asking him to answer the questions and the questions kept getting blown off. The fact is, if there's an even "moderate"(whatever that is) breakdown/crash, there is no conceivable government response. There are no back up cities-full of this stuff called "infrastructure". In my opinion, all "rememdiation" work should have been temporarily suspeneded, last year, to be replaced by an extensive nation wide plan of basic service and personal/family calm and rational preparedness and a continuation of everything plan. After that was in place, then a return to rememdiation, testing, whatever is going on now. As it stands, the industrial/governmental/mass media has put all it's eggs in the "It'll all be fixed by dec 31'st(even tho a lot of them already missed the first of those 31st dates, btw...)" basket--with the consequences of their being wrong quite terrible. The other way would have been more sane and rational, my opinion. We have grains rotting on the ground out west, when the distribution system is set up now quite adequately to provide large quantities cheaply, to all supermarkets. Battery production could have been run up, solar panel production, wood stoves, wells put in,etc,etc, etc. Sure, I'm a capitalist-supply and demand-- but I also feel that if the true ramifications of failure where known --just the barest of honest "what- ifs"-that that would have occured. Instead, before any real assessment was really done, it was already been touted as a non-event, and folks raising the issue as being alarmists. That's the position gov and biz and media has taken, and they'll have to live with that decision now, so I don't think "the masses" will get much in the way of honest trustworthy reporting until the baygens are only picking up the odd HAM signal--too late then. I predict plenty of punched noses, and an amazing dearth of folks who will admit to being programmers, management types, politicians or news reporters next year. Just my opinion, certainly not carved in stone, and emininetly troll-able, as always.

It's still an elephant, though, no matter who tries to tell me it's not.

-- zog (zog@avana.net), April 15, 1999.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ