Dear Stephen, Thank you for taking the time to post you astrological predictions. I am not an astrologer, but I enjoy reading them.

The last post confuses me a bit. It seems contradictory. Can you help me to understand a little better?

I will concisely review the confusing parts: At the end of the introduction/recap you say, A major turnaround in the world situation will begin in May 2000, when six of the seven major planets will transit through the constellation of Aries. But for the next three months, the world situation will tend to get worse before it gets better.  That sounds good. I take that to mean a little trouble near term, but things look good after May.

Then, summarizing the sections: 1) Stocks decline. They may recover by mid Jan.. If Y2K is bad, then recovery starts after early May.  This agrees with the above statement. Hang on until next summer.

2) Recession lasting 6 to 9 months. Housing prices drop, recover after June. - This agrees with the above statement.

3) Y2K will disrupt the world economy for months. - This agrees with the above statement. But, I find it hard to believe the world economy to be so resilient to recover this quickly from the disruptions that you mention. Much of the world has still not recovered from the last economic upset which did not degrade infrastructure.

4) Increasing danger of conflict and terrorism. Possibility of WWlll.  I find it hard to believe that in the face of WWlll, the world economy will continue to burgeon. Going back to the intro/recap, this sounds like the opposite of,  a major turnaround in the world situation.

I can not recall a single instance where the application of force has changed the recipients view point. That is, unless they have developed secret weapons that cause the intended target to become enlightened. Or, at least acquire a measure of modest wisdom.

Thanks for any clarification, Roger

-- (roger@netdex.com), October 07, 1999