big flower !greenspun.com : LUSENET : Nature Photography Image Critique : One Thread |
thanks.
-- santanu (santanu_nag@hotmail.com), October 21, 1999
oops.
-- santanu (santanu_nag@hotmail.com), October 21, 1999.
UUgh! sorry guy.
-- santanu (santanu_nag@hotmail.com), October 21, 1999.
Please right click on image and choose 'view image'. Is there a better way ? Sincere Apologies for the hassle.
-- santanu (santanu_nag@hotmail.com), October 21, 1999.
It's not you, it's Tripod. Your HTML tags are correct. Try posting the image on a different homepage provider like Geocities or something.My comment is the cropping cuts off part of the flower. It's also a tad blue. If this is an accurate scan, a warming filter (81A) would have helped. You didn't say what film you used, but Ektachrome is notorious for being a "cold" film. If you do a lot of shooting under these conditions you may want to switch to a "warmer" film.
Hope it helps.
Keith
-- Keith Clark (ClarkPhotograpy@spiritone.com), October 22, 1999.
I agree with the first post about color, also the image is out of focus at the top and the highlights are burned out, this could be a good photo. Pat
-- pat j. krentz (krentz@cci-29palms.com), October 22, 1999.
This looks like either cow parsnip or angelica. Without a better look at the leaves and stem it's hard to tell which. Looks like the stem might be smooth and purple, in which case it's angelica.
-- Raphael (phocr@chaparraltree.com), October 22, 1999.