OT (Overseas Topic) China: The PLA Gets Back Into Business

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread


The PLA Gets Back Into Business

0128 GMT 000216

Link

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) continues to play an important role in Chinese business despite President Jiang Zemin's 18-month old ban on doing so. According to a Feb. 15 report by Reuters, the PLA has not only kept its stake in China Great Wall Communications, but has formed a new telecommunications company: Hebei Century Mobile Communications.

By expanding into so-called CDMA, Code-Division Mulitiple Access cellular service like that used in the United States, the military is moving into a high profile, lucrative market. By doing so, the PLA can continue to fund itself independently of the central government in Beijing. In political terms, the militarys newly revealed enterprise strongly suggests that Jiang is not firmly in control of the situation. Abroad, this development is a warning to foreign investors who are watching Chinas bid to join the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Largely untapped by foreign investors, Chinas cellular telephone market has tremendous growth possibilities. There are 40 million users, and the dominant company  state-run China Telecom  reports that its customer base has grown 44 percent per year.

But the telecommunications industry is also an important political flashpoint, particularly as the country prepares to join the WTO. Conservatives in the Information Industry Ministry, led by Wu Jichuan, have worked to protect the monopoly of Chinese firms. They fear that opening the market to foreigners would siphon money away from the Communist Party and cost the party its power over an important instrument of control. On the other side of the spectrum, reformists such as Prime Minister Zhu Rongji have argued that opening this industry is essential to enhancing productivity and competitiveness. The PLA, for its part, wants to protect its ability to do business.

The PLAs bid to provide American-style cellular service suggests two things. First, Jiang is unable to enforce his most important command to the military; the PLA continues to seek its own sources of funding and ultimately some degree of independence from Beijing. Second, Jiang may be unable to deliver the lucrative Chinese telecommunications market to foreigners, even though membership in the WTO requires it.

In domestic political terms, it appears that neither Jiang nor the reformers are fully in control of the situation. And Jiangs fence-straddling strategy  trying to split the difference between economic reformers and hard-liners  may be failing. The Hong Kong magazine Kai Fang reported that party members in the Communist Party Central Committee want Jiang to step down as secretary after the 16th National Party Congress. Its even possible that Jiang himself winked at the PLAs new enterprise in an attempt to appease the military.

) 2000 WNI, Inc. All rights reserved.



-- Possible Impact (posim@hotmail.com), February 16, 2000

Answers

<sarcasm>

Just think how much better the budget would look if we "spun off" army.com, navy.com, and air force.com. We could increase the R&D budget as much as the shareholders would allow. There seems to be a "Global Market" for our services.

I bet we could get a market cap of 5 Trillion. As long as the US held a 51% ownership, the country would "be safe". Yep, run them "For Profit", the Romans did.
</sarcasm>

-- Possible Impact (posim@hotmail.com), February 16, 2000.


If there's anything good about the PLA being such a large business entity, this points it out. If the PLA makes enough money the warlords will be as or more powerful than the Bejing politicians and conflict between the factions might just derail any international schemes.

In a best case scenario the Chinese military will not only become more interested in following its own economic interests, being a defacto separate nation and economy operating within the Chinese nation and economy. But even moreso, maybe there will be internal squabbles between the warlords to bring the whole house of cards down.

Look at China's past for good examples.

WW

-- Wildweasel (vtmldm@epix.net), February 17, 2000.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ