This is something for you to think about while I am gone. New threads can be displayed either oldest first or newest first. Which would you prefer?

Dave: If you monitor this thread and see a definite vote for newest first, than change it. Otherwise it will stay the way it is.

-- Ken S. in WC TN (scharabo@aol.com), May 16, 2001

Answers

Newest first - much easier to read. Change it, please!

-- David and Kim (fleece@eritter.net), May 16, 2001.

Newest First ... please...

-- j (jw_hsv@yahoo.com), May 16, 2001.

New first, I think.

-- Willy Allen (willyallen2@yahoo.com), May 16, 2001.

I'll vote for newest first also.

Carol

-- Carol Mora (carollm@rockbridge.net), May 16, 2001.

new first, Daryll

-- Daryll (twincrk@hotmail.com), May 16, 2001.

New first, please!

-- Karen (db0421@yahoo.com), May 16, 2001.

New 1st! Thank you

-- Debbie T in N.C. (rdtyner@mindspring.com), May 16, 2001.

I'm easy, (but not cheap!) Newest first, please! Jan

-- Jan in CO (Janice12@aol.com), May 16, 2001.

Newest first, please! When new to this forum I found it quite confusing to have the oldest first. Thanks!

-- Elizabeth in e tx (kimprice@peoplescom.net), May 16, 2001.

Newest first would be great. Thank you. Tracy

-- tracy emily in TN (emilyfarms@tsixroads.com), May 16, 2001.

Newest first!

-- Cordy (ckaylegian@aol.com), May 16, 2001.

Looks like a trend emerging... I believe if a thing ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

But hey, I just do like I’m told. The order is now changed. Newest threads are on the top.

I think that changing the thread order could result in some confusion for those of us who have gotten used to looking at this forum “backwards”, so I also added the date each question was posted.

-- Dave Belanger (Publisher@countrysidemag.com), May 16, 2001.

Thank you Mr. Dave. And Ken, I though you were gone off on your adventure!

-- Cindy in KY (solidrockranch@hotmail.com), May 16, 2001.

Ditto on the above votes!

-- Judi (ddecaro@snet.net), May 16, 2001.

Much easier with newest firt. Thank You.

-- Jay Blair in N. AL. (jayblair678@yahoo.com), May 16, 2001.

I vote for newest responses first.

-- jennifer (schwabauer@aol.com), May 16, 2001.

new first,much easier.

-- Tom (tjk@cac.net), May 16, 2001.

well at least now I see why the forum looks so weird..

sarah (who is a wee bit slow on the uptake!)

-- Sarah (heartsongacres@juno.com), May 16, 2001.

newest first, please!
Thanks!

-- (perry@ofuzzy1.com), May 16, 2001.

Okay, quit playing with my head. I was trying to find a post that I started several days ago because I wanted to thank everybody for their responses and I couldn't find it. I knew I had posted after particular posts and I went all the way to the bottom and I couldn't find it and was really mystified. Then I just went through them one by one until I found it thinking that I was just mistaken about when I posted it. Then when I found it I thought I was going nuts because I thought these went in the other direction the last time I was on here. Then I saw this thread. I feel a lot saner now.

-- Colleen (pyramidgreatdanes@erols.com), May 16, 2001.

Glad I saw this, thought my head was backarsewards! New first is fine.

-- Annie Miller in SE OH (annie@1st.net), May 16, 2001.

New, please. Some of these threads get so long...now I could read, cut and run before they finish loading....

Thanks for considering this!

-- sheepish (WA) (the_original_sheepish@hotmail.com), May 16, 2001.

Agrred. Were good reasons for the other order when the forum was smaller. Are good reasons for it to be this way now the forum has expanded.

-- Don Armstrong (darmst@yahoo.com.au), May 16, 2001.

Great! I like it exept I gotta retrain this old brain! Keep up the great work guys! God bless!

-- Ardie from WI (a6203@hotmail.com), May 17, 2001.