Global Trends 2015: A Dialogue About the Future With Nongovernment Experts

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Beyond the Sidewalks : One Thread

Hey, Jim, I wasn't sure about the category for this. If you think of a better one, go ahead and change it!

Follow this link at your own peril: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/globaltrends2015/

I got it from an email group. Sort of an unusual thing to come up there . . . Anyway, the CIA is prognosticating about the future. I've only looked at a TINY bit, but it all looks scary to me. If you're trying for only peace of mind, probably shouldn't go read it. What I read makes me want to scamper out and get PV's, earth sheltered, geothermally heated home, and develop my own water catchment system -- like tomorrow!

And I wonder what kind of "spin" they're putting on things and what classified documents they have that contradict this. If this is the ROSY picture, what the heck is the not-so-Pollyanna scenario? See, I can be paranoid too! Actually, it might be a good idea to print this out and see how much of it is actually accurate about 14 years from now!

Below is a snippet from the site, the introduction to it more or less:

Over the past 15 months, the National Intelligence Council (NIC), in close collaboration with US Government specialists and a wide range of experts outside the government, has worked to identify major drivers and trends that will shape the world of 2015.

The key drivers identified are:

(l) Demographics.

(2) Natural resources and environment.

(3) Science and technology.

(4) The global economy and globalization.

(5) National and international governance.

(6) Future conflict.

(7) The role of the United States.

In examining these drivers, several points should be kept in mind:

No single driver or trend will dominate the global future in 2015.

Each driver will have varying impacts in different regions and countries.

The drivers are not necessarily mutually reinforcing; in some cases, they will work at cross-purposes.

Taken together, these drivers and trends intersect to create an integrated picture of the world of 2015, about which we can make projections with varying degrees of confidence and identify some troubling uncertainties of strategic importance to the United States.

The Methodology Global Trends 2015 provides a flexible framework to discuss and debate the future. The methodology is useful for our purposes, although admittedly inexact for the social scientist. Our purpose is to rise above short-term, tactical considerations and provide a longer-term, strategic perspective. Judgments about demographic and natural resource trends are based primarily on informed extrapolation of existing trends. In contrast, many judgments about science and technology, economic growth, globalization, governance, and the nature of conflict represent a distillation of views of experts inside and outside the United States Government. The former are projections about natural phenomena, about which we can have fairly high confidence; the latter are more speculative because they are contingent upon the decisions that societies and governments will make.

The drivers we emphasize will have staying power. Some of the trends will persist; others will be less enduring and may change course over the time frame we consider. The major contribution of the National Intelligence Council (NIC), assisted by experts from the Intelligence Community, has been to harness US Government and nongovernmental specialists to identify drivers, to determine which ones matter most, to highlight key uncertainties, and to integrate analysis of these trends into a national security context. The result identifies issues for more rigorous analysis and quantification.

Revisiting Global Trends 2010: How Our Assessments Have Changed Over the past four years, we have tested the judgments made in the predecessor, Global Trends 2010, published in 1997. Global Trends 2010 was the centerpiece of numerous briefings, conferences, and public addresses. Various audiences were energetic in challenging, modifying or confirming our judgments. The lively debate that ensued has expanded our treatment of drivers, altered some projections we made in 1997, and matured our thinking overall—which was the essential purpose of this exercise.

Global Trends 2015 amplifies several drivers identified previously, and links them more closely to the trends we now project over the next 15 years. Some of the key changes include:

Globalization has emerged as a more powerful driver. GT 2015 sees international economic dynamics—including developments in the World Trade Organization—and the spread of information technology as having much greater influence than portrayed in GT 2010.

GT 2015 assigns more significance to the importance of governance, notably the ability of states to deal with nonstate actors, both good and bad. GT 2015 pays attention both to the opportunities for cooperation between governments and private organizations and to the growing reach of international criminal and terrorist networks.

GT 2015 includes a more careful examination of the likely role of science and technology as a driver of global developments. In addition to the growing significance of information technology, biotechnology and other technologies carry much more weight in the present assessment.

The effect of the United States as the preponderant power is introduced in GT 2015. The US role as a global driver has emerged more clearly over the past four years, particularly as many countries debate the impact of "US hegemony" on their domestic and foreign policies.

GT 2015 provides a more complete discussion of natural resources including food, water, energy, and the environment. It discusses, for example, the over three billion individuals who will be living in water-stressed regions from North China to Africa and the implications for conflict. The linkage between energy availability, price, and distribution is more thoroughly explored.

GT 2015 emphasizes interactions among the drivers. For example, we discuss the relationship between S&T, military developments, and the potential for conflict.

In the regional sections, GT 2015 makes projections about the impact of the spread of information, the growing power of China, and the declining power of Russia. Events and trends in key states and regions over the last four years have led us to revise some projections substantially in GT 2015.

GT 2010 did not foresee the global financial crisis of 1997-98; GT 2015 takes account of obstacles to economic development in East Asia, though the overall projections remain fairly optimistic.

As described in GT 2010, there is still substantial uncertainty regarding whether China can cope with internal political and economic trends. GT 2015 highlights even greater uncertainty over the direction of Beijing's regional policies.

Many of the global trends continue to remain negative for the societies and regimes in the Middle East. GT 2015 projects at best a "cold peace" between Israel and its adversaries and sees prospects for potentially destabilizing social changes due to adverse effects of globalization and insufficient attention to reform. The spike in oil revenues reinforces the assessment of GT 2010 about the rising demand for OPEC oil; these revenues are not likely to be directed primarily at core human resources and social needs.

Projections for Sub-Saharan Africa are even more dire than in GT 2010 because of the spread of AIDS and the continuing prospects for humanitarian crises, political instability, and military conflicts.

-- Anonymous, June 10, 2001

Answers

Whoa.I'm definitely going to have read the rest of this on a bad day.Too pretty out today to ruin it.I'll get back to you;o)

-- Anonymous, June 10, 2001

Yeah, Sharon, I've barely looked at it myself. And it's one of those afraid to look, but afraid not to sort of things! Ugh!

-- Anonymous, June 10, 2001

I'm going to take a peak at this one. I like to keep an open mind about things and read all schools of thought. I think this helps me to keep a balance perspective on where we can end up in the future and it also helps me from being too surprised when major events occur. I personally have believed for the last five years that China will be our main adversary in the future. I believe they will outgrow their land and need to overtake others in order to continue their power. I'm sure their neighbors think the same thing. I'll comment on the website when I get back.

-- Anonymous, June 10, 2001

Hey, Jim, I wasn't sure about the category for this. If you think of a better one, go ahead and change it!

Joy: I can't think of a new category for it but it should be fine in this one. Thanks for posting it, I'll have to give it a read when time permits.

Also, did I see you post something on another thread about not being as active on our little forum in the future because of a new dog in your life? I sure hope that doesn't end up being the case - you'd be sorely missed.

P.S. - I do hope everything is going relatively smooth with the new fur-face in your family.

-- Anonymous, June 11, 2001


Ha ha, Jim, LESS active doesn't mean you'll get rid of me entirely. This is a laptop -- if necessary, I'll take it down to the dog's room (currently in animal separation mode), and work down there! ;-)

-- Anonymous, June 11, 2001


Moderation questions? read the FAQ