CIPRO - U.S. threatens Bayer patent suspension unless price lowered

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Current News - Homefront Preparations : One Thread

http://www.boston.com/news/daily/23/anthrax_cipro.htm

Government threatens Bayer patent suspension unless Cipro price are lowered

By Associated Press, 10/23/01

WASHINGTON - Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said Tuesday that he is prepared to go to Congress to seek a generic version of an antibiotic used to treat anthrax infection if the manufacturer does not lower its price.

"The price is the question, not the supply," he told a congressional hearing.

Bayer Corp. holds the patent on Cipro, the antibiotic being prescribed to thousands of postal workers as a precaution to protect them from anthrax infection -- as well as to dozens of other people exposed to anthrax-containing letters.

Federal health officials are looking to increase a government stockpile of the antibiotic in case wider treatment is needed. Thompson said Bayer says it can make 200 million pills within 60 days, enough to treat 12 million people.

But the price the government would have to pay to stockpile those pills is in dispute. "I can assure you we are not going to pay the price they are asking," Thompson said.

Thompson did not reveal that price, but said negotiations would resume Tuesday afternoon. Bayer did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

But Bayer just promised the Canadian government to deliver emergency supplies of Cipro, in event of a bioterrorism attack there, for $1.30 a pill. That agreement apparently ends Canada's threat to suspend Bayer's Cipro patent and buy the medication from a generic producer instead.

Thompson said he would consider going to Congress to seek a waiver of the patent and allow production of a generic medication if Bayer does not lower its price.

In a full-page ad in The Washington Post, Bayer said it was substantially increasing production of Cipro. "We will meet this threat head on," the ad said.

-- Anonymous, October 23, 2001


Moderation questions? read the FAQ