Phone company charges man $337.50 penalty for being an arrogant bastard

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Current News - Homefront Preparations : One Thread

Really

Hefty bill with added insult shocks Telecom customer

13.02.2002 By AMIE RICHARDSON

Telecom has ordered an investigation after a customer received an account charging him a "penalty for being an arrogant bastard".

Auckland businessman James Storrie discovered the $337.50 charge, printed under "product or service", when he opened his mobile phone bill on Monday.

Mr Storrie said he complained to Telecom last week that his phone had been disconnected. He was told it was cut off after being reported stolen - although it had not been.

He was unaware of having any enemies within Telecom, or any friends who might have sent the account as a practical joke.

Three years ago he made a complaint because of a problem with a Yellow Pages advertisement for his company, but that was settled last year.

"How can they speak to their clients like this?" he said. "It's downright rude."

The wording appeared as a normal piece of information under the "rental and activity" section of Mr Storrie's monthly bill.

Telecom spokesman Andrew Bristol said the company was "absolutely aghast" by what had happened and had apologised.

Mr Storrie has said he will accept a confidential compensation package and will keep his account with Telecom.

Mr Bristol said the company had launched an internal investigation into the unusual "penalty" and the mobile disconnection that Mr Storrie had questioned.

Telecom could not explain how such a "penalty" could have been printed on the account. A reference number which preceded the $337.50 amount did not mean anything.

"As far as we were concerned, it couldn't happen," he said.

He could not say if anyone would lose their job over the incident, because it was too early in the investigation to know what had taken place.

Consumers' Institute chief executive David Russell said there was no consumer law that protected a customer from being called an "arrogant bastard".

However, in civil law, it could be viewed as defamation.

-- Anonymous, February 14, 2002

Answers

Do you guys stay up all night looking for this stuff???? This is wild.

-- Anonymous, February 14, 2002

We have no life. I dunno about Carl, I never read his stuff.

-- Anonymous, February 14, 2002

If he sued over it, he would have to lose cuz only an arrogant bastard would sue.

As for diane's question, I work nights. I just got home. I only read Carl's threads when they have funny titles.

I dunno about Carl, either. He doesn't read my stuff.

-- Anonymous, February 15, 2002


I don't read your stuff either. Snort!

-- Anonymous, February 15, 2002

yes you do.

I know.

-- Anonymous, February 15, 2002



I secretly read all of Carl's stuff, as long as the word cat doesn't appear in the header. If it does, I skip it because I just know it'll be something gross.

I've lived along freeways and have seen enough mangled kitties for this life time.

-- Anonymous, February 15, 2002


Hey, don't pick on me... I read most the posts, except the ones from Drudge....

-- Anonymous, February 15, 2002

Dang Carl... that means you don't read most of my posts *snif*

-- Anonymous, February 15, 2002

I read your post apoc... just I read Drudge first thing in the morning, so if I'm short on time, I skip reading the same news here, unless I want a place to rant about it :)

-- Anonymous, February 15, 2002

Moderation questions? read the FAQ