As I have said, I am not with enough time to read everything, so I must risk saying thing already said.

Have you ever noticed the absurd paradix concerning opinions about cloning today?

Most scientists (at least those heard by the large media) defend "cloning for therapeuthic reasons" and condemn "cloning for full development".

Now, although both forms of cloning are a devilry, the "therapeuthic" version is much more immoral that the other, as it involves deliberate destruction of embryos (abortion), while the "full development", at least in theory (not considering the risks of spontaneous abortion, ill formation etc.), does not involve deliberate killing of human lives. However, scientists think it "highly immoral", at the same time they think "therapeuthic" cloning a very good thing...

Go figure!

Sodoma and Gomorra were monasteries compared to our world...

-- Atila (me@somewhere.com), April 09, 2002

Answers

Cloning to this man is likened to the evolution of Mary Shelly's nightmare turned into a classic book - Frankenstein -. She ended the work by saying to do these things with understanding peace and patience. -paraphrased.

The idiotic dream of man to overcome nature and become Godlike has been the result of in part of The Industrial Revolution along with the Age Of Reason. Sadly most have forgotten our complete dependancy on The Father.

Two most dangerous man of recent history to me has been and C.G. Jung both believing in Man as Superman which so many have bought.

When studying Anatomy and Physiology it was pointed the human nervous system has a lifespan of 147 years at best due to chemical properties.

-- Jean Bouchard (jeanb@cwk.imag.net), April 10, 2002.