Introduction of the Flush Toilet Deplored at Earth Summit

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Current News - Homefront Preparations : One Thread

[This came out September 30 but is so absurd I saved it for when the board came back up.]

By Marc Morano CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer August 30, 2002

Johannesburg (CNSNews.com) - In what some see as a sign that the Earth summit is literally going down the drain, an environmentalist at the Earth summit here has lamented the introduction of the flush toilet.

One of the panelists taking part in a television special on the Earth summit complained about the "pernicious introduction of the flush toilet," according to Competitive Entreprise Institute President Fred Smith, who also was a panelist on the program.

The TV special, hosted by hosted PBS's Bill Moyers, was taped on Tuesday and is set to air Friday night.

A female panelist from India complained that the flush toilet encourages excessive water consumption around the world and is not ecologically friendly.

The remark prompted an associate of Smith, CEI's Chris Horner, to ponder what alternative the woman would suggest. "Presumably the preferred solution to human waste problems is now abstinence," Horner quipped.

It was unclear whether the remark will make the final edit of the PBS program "NOW with Bill Moyers." NOW and the BBC are presenting "The Earth Debate," a special 90-minute program taped at the United Nation's World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg.

Horner said the program panel was stacked against those who questioned the green movement.

"This was pre-taped and is being edited by folks with a clear...perspective. So much of the 'debate' that did occur with the few skeptics on the panel is likely to be not fully represented," Horner said.

Horner said suggestions such as doing away with flush toilets "certainly are consistent with the massively increased privation that the Greens' agenda would ensure."

Lamenting Electricity

Earlier this week, Gar Smith, the editor of the Earth Island Institute's online journal "The Edge," lamented the introduction of electricity. (See story)

"I don't think a lot of electricity is a good thing. It is the fuel that powers a lot of multi-national imagery," Smith told CNSNews.com .

According to Smith, electricity can wreak havoc on cultures. "I have seen villages in Africa that had vibrant culture and great communities that were disrupted and destroyed by the introduction of electricity," he said.

Changing How We Flush Toilets

A critic of the green movement, Danish author Bjorn Lomborg, told CNSNews.com , "Changing how we flush toilets is not going to change water supplies."

Lomborg also served as a panelist for the PBS television special and he said he, too, heard the Indian panelist condemn flush toilets during the show's taping.

According to Lomborg, household water consumption worldwide constitutes only 8 percent of total usage, so changing the way we flush will not have any significant impact on water usage, he said. Agriculture accounts for 69 percent of water usage, while industry uses 23 percent, Lomborg said.

''You don't start with making the 8 percent (household water consumption) more efficient,'' he said.

Lomborg, once a committed member of Greenpeace, became disillusioned with the green movement because of what he considered its distortion of eco-science. He said people who bemoan the flush toilet are typical of the Green movement's "tendency to focus on stuff that looks easy."

Lomborg joked that maybe the panelist thought "we should use the Asian toilet method where you use your hand and a little water."

According to a website sponsored by Asia Travel Mart, bathrooms throughout Asia do not use modern flush mechanisms. According to the website, "A bucket and ladle serve an integral role in both bathing and toiletry." "Toilet paper is not available in most homes," the website also noted.

'Toiletogogy'

Controversy overflows as to just who invented the original flush toilet.

According to the ''toiletogogy'' website, some credit Thomas Crapper, while others say Alexander Cumming patented a flushing device in 1775. Still others go back to 16th century and give credit to a Sir John Harrington.

This is not the first time that flush toilets have generated controversy. The U.S. government federally mandated the use of low-flow, 1.6-galloon toilets in 1995 as part of the National Energy Policy Act. The new, water-conserving low-flow toilets replaced 3.5-gallon models.

The low-flow toilets were championed by former Vice President Al Gore and other environmentalists, but many consumers disliked them, complaining they required a second flush.

Press reports note the older, high-flush-capacity toilets are now sold on the black-market, sometimes smuggled into the U.S. from Mexico and Canada.

'Inject Guilt'

Patrick Moore, head of the environmental advocacy group Greenspirit and a former founding member of Greenpeace who left after becoming disillusioned with the Green movement, believes those who would do away with electricity and flush toilets hold a "naive vision of returning to some kind of Garden of Eden, which was actually not that great because the average life span was 35."

Said Moore, "The environmentalists try to inject guilt into people for consuming, as if consuming by itself causes destruction to the environment. There is no truth to that. You have the wealthiest countries on earth with the best-looked-after environment."



-- Anonymous, September 03, 2002

Answers

Why not two birds with one stone?

An electric toilet.

LOL

Loved the 'abstinence' quip!

-- Anonymous, September 03, 2002


Lomberg and Moore are idiots.

In the name of protecting the populace from learning enough to take healthy care of itself, the public sewer system was invented. Does a damn good job removing drinking water from the watershed. Flush toilets are a significant contributor towards that in many areas.

It was one of my prerollover concerns that if either the water or sewer system stopped working, the populace would have forgotten the little it ever knew about safely crapping and peeing in the woods.

No reason that PROPERLY composted human poop can't be used in the vegetable garden, and tossing pee sure is a waste of a good nitrogen source.

And never had a problem with my 1.6'ers.

-- Anonymous, September 03, 2002


If you are rich and have lots of time to mess around, there are composting toilets of various types: I look at them whenever I visit Lehman's Hardware up in Amish Country. One type incinerates the waste by using propane.

Given the many 1K+ price tags, I don't see any going into nearby homes soon, but having one would solve a very large problem with some very rocky land I've been looking at as a "camping spot."

-- Anonymous, September 04, 2002


Check this out! composting toilets are becoming mainstream . . .

http://www.cityfarmer.org/comptoilet64.html

Link

-- Anonymous, September 04, 2002


Meemur, the humanure toilet can be built very cheaply (plywood frame, 5-gallon bucket, toilet seat). Then you just need a source of finely chopped organic material, like sawdust or leaves. The problem is (I assume) it doesn't meet code.

-- Anonymous, September 04, 2002


That's what's cool about the toilets I linked to, Brooks, they meet code.

Yeah, I know about humanure. I just don't trust hot composting methods in the winter with sub-zero wind chills. And then there's a pile left to process in the spring if composting didn't take place over the winter.

Were I farther south, I'd have more options (and more bugs!) -- mixed blessings. . . .

-- Anonymous, September 04, 2002


Were I farther south, I'd have more options (and more bugs!) -- mixed blessings. . . .

Is that a crack I see?

-- Anonymous, September 04, 2002


I know, I know! Let's all move to SC and start a survival community! Barefoot can be in charge of the mail.

-- Anonymous, September 04, 2002

Gawd....have any of these idiots traveled to 3rd world nations? In Mongolia they don't even use a pit. They have a grill work made out of 2x4s that lays on the ground. You walk up on that(gingerly, I might add, watching where you step) and squat and try and hit the space between the boards. Its awful. Go into a MODERN restraurant where they have a flush toilet and you think you are in heaven (tho they don't seem to be able to hit that any better than the slats outside) UNTIL you sit down at the table. Next to the table is a flume. When someone flushes the toilet it all comes down the flume within 15 inches of your plate. Oh yeah....give up the flush toilets. Well, if they used decent privys, it wouldn't be too bad. India is also bad. It doesn't bother me to step in cow shit, but when you realize its not cow shit....it does something to you. LOL Taz

-- Anonymous, September 05, 2002

Moderation questions? read the FAQ